The table below show the monthly family expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001. Summarise the information and make comparison where possible.
The table below consist of data on average Australian people sending habits on variety of bills each month in dollars, the information is about two years 1991 and 2001.
If summarized totally increased in monthly expenses by Australians nation observed during ten year time period. The expenditures includes food, electricity and water, housing, transport and other goods and services. And total expenses of each month increased from 675 to 715 dollar.
In both years highest amount was spending on food, which is relatively high in 2001 that is 160 dollars per month, it was 155 dollars in 1991. In similar manners for both years lowest number of dollars were spend on clothing, but its further decreased in 2001 by 10 dollars from 1991 when it was 30 dollars per month.
The wider gap of bills of electricity and water can be shown between 1991 and 2001, which means energy and water became expensive as on these spending was 75 dollars per month in 1991 and in 2001 climbed to 120 dollars by 2001. The prices of property slightly enhanced 5 dollar in 2001 that was 95 dollars in 1991. Also on other goods and services spending were 250 dollars in 1991 and 270 dollars in 2001. On the other hand transportation services noticed cheaper as 45 dollars in 2001 previously in 1991 was 70 dollars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ation is about two years 1991 and 2001. If summarized totally increased in monthly...
^^^
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'include'.
Suggestion: include
... ten year time period. The expenditures includes food, electricity and water, housing, t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...of each month increased from 675 to 715 dollar. In both years highest amount was spen...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'years the highest'.
Suggestion: years the highest
...reased from 675 to 715 dollar. In both years highest amount was spending on food, which is r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'years the lowest'.
Suggestion: years the lowest
...rs in 1991. In similar manners for both years lowest number of dollars were spend on clothin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...oth years lowest number of dollars were spend on clothing, but its further decreased ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
... prices of property slightly enhanced 5 dollar in 2001 that was 95 dollars in 1991. Al...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ar in 2001 that was 95 dollars in 1991. Also on other goods and services spending we...
^^^^
Line 4, column 465, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...transportation services noticed cheaper as 45 dollars in 2001 previously in 1991 w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76888888889 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47031162127 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6900417648 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.3 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173919712951 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854719386265 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595174161175 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132064619782 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713490584497 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.