The table below shows information about age, average income per person and population below proverty line in three states in USA
The table shows data about three different elements to decide which group of people is below the poverty line in California, Utah, and Florida.
In general, it is clear that California registers the highest average income per person even though its population is very poor. People aging under 18 are the poorest in Utah while those who aged over 60 I below the poverty line in Floria.
Firstly, Utah has the largest number of poor teenagers which stands at 28% while the figures for California and Florida are slightly close to each other, at 17% and 16% respectively. People who fall into the age group above 60 have a smaller percentage of those being below the property line, which varied between 8% and 23%.
California residents make the most out of living since their income on average is registered at $23,000 per person, followed by Florida figures which closely at the same amount of money, at $22,000 each individual. Lastly, people have the lowest average income, each of them has $17,000 come into their budget. However, the number of people who are significantly poor is lowest in Utah just a little under 10%. In contrast to the previous figures that are seen in California and Florida, they make up 16% and 12% in turn in terms of population below the poverty line.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, so, while, in contrast, in general, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75675675676 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36698746441 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3103903097 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24537282329 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105560048459 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796775522154 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177304230291 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796377376157 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.