the table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after in was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same tow periods.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following table illustrates the number of people who visited Ashdown Museum a year before and a year after it’s refurbishment, with the charts providing some information about to what extent the visitors became satisfied during the same two courses.
As can be clearly observed from the pie charts, whereas there was a remarkable climb in the percentage of very satisfied people, by 15% during a year prior refurbishment to 35% after refurbishment, the share of visitors who didn’t respond remained unchanged with 5% in the same two years. Moreover, the proportion of satisfied people experienced a significant rise from 30% to 40% before and after redecoration.
On the other hand, despite the fact that very dissatisfied visitors of the museum were halved from 10% to 5% prior and following the museum was redesigned, dissatisfied visitors’ percentage fell sharply from 40% before refurbishment to 15% after renovation of the museum.
It is clear from the table that 74000 individuals made a visit to the museum before it’s renovation, and so the number of visitors witnessed a significant increase after refurbishment and reached 92000 during the following year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-23 | sattar_iust | 73 | view |
- A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation Do you agree or disagree 80
- Some people think that life experience is more important than the formal education provided is schools and universities How far do you agree with this statement and provide examples 88
- People s poor health is because of lifestyle how the lifestyle influences the health And how national health services should response to the issue how should health medical department responds 77
- The charts below show the results of a survey if adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared Write a report for a university lecturer descr 72
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which my be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32620320856 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07132555962 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540106951872 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.4272664692 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 199.2 112.824112599 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.4 22.9334400587 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392214774869 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221713079363 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102499036465 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260120058734 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776056864087 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.4 13.2329268293 169% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 61.2550243902 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.