The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table illustrates the number of people who visited to Ashdown museum in the year prior and post to the renovation, while the two pie charts exhibit the survey outcomes of the visitor's perceptions regarding their stay at the museum in both years.
Overall, the tourism at the museum had increased dramatically due to refurbishment, as a result, the satisfaction level of the visitors also escalated significantly. However, the percentage of non-respondents had remained constant before and after museum's renovation.
Initially, visitors had accounted for 74000 before the refurbishment of the museum. The survey results indicated that It had dissatisfied over a one-third visitors before refurbishment, while there was only 15% of people had enjoyed with much satisfaction during their stay at the museum. Under the fifth number of visitors had many concerns about their museum's spendings. By contrast, the proportion of people, who did not respond to the survey, stayed one-twentieth of visits.
Tourists had increased by 18000 after a year of museum's renovation. The survey outcomes revealed that museum had attracted a lot of people satisfactory (40%) and very satisfied tourist climbed to just over one-third of visitors. Contrary, the dissatisfaction of people lowered to 15% by the museums' renovation. Additionally, the renovated museum had dropped very dissatisfaction proportion of visitors to a one-twentieth of visits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'museums'' or 'museum's'?
Suggestion: museums'; museum's
...faction of people lowered to 15% by the museums renovation. Additionally, the renovated...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itors to a one-twentieth of visits.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, third, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61926605505 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29723353905 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518348623853 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.5813750837 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.363636364 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273348876686 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111655975129 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696577023798 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180815521646 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654567057987 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.