The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

The two pie charts illustrate the data on the level of satisfaction the visitors had while visiting before and after restoration in the Ashdown museum. Overall, it is can be observed that the museum was more successful in terms of number of visitors the year after refurbishment.

As regards to the surveys, the visitor numbers increased about one-third in the two years from 74,000 to 92,000. It is noticeable that the portion of dissatisfied visitors is almost half were shown unpleasant outcomes before it start construction, however this consequences changed into a beneficial result, where it found only 15% of visitors were not satisfied after constructed. What is remarkable is the number of highly satisfied visitors were accounted for 35% more than doubled after it converted the museum.

Likewise, it is worth to mention that the portion of 5% satisfied travelers shown a half decreased during the year after refurbishment. Furthermore, there were only 5% of people who did not talk about their visiting Ashdown museum experience in both throughout the surveyed periods.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s before it start construction, however this consequences changed into a beneficial ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oth throughout the surveyed periods.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, likewise, third, while, as regards

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37572254335 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95367238547 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595375722543 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3423167818 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.857142857 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411790511299 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174783687434 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301230113938 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267600450628 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270576227608 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.