The given table compares the figure of visitors to one specific museum, which is the Ashdown Museum, between the year before and year after refurbishment, and the information given in pie charts make comparisons of the result of questionnaire associating to whatever visitors satisfied.
During the year before refurbishment when the total number of visitors was 74000, surveys of their satisfaction were bad results. "Dissatisfied" was ranked the fist with 40% which were higher than the percentage of satisfied people by exactly 10% while the third of the total proportion was occupied by 'very satisfied' which were more than "very dissatisfied" by 5% which were the same proportion with unresponded visitors.
During the year after refurbishment, the total figure of visitors significantly increased to 92000. Portion of visitors voting ‘very satisfied’ rapidly rose from 15% to 35% whereas the highest percentage changed by "satisfied" at 40% which are two times as much as proportions of "dissatisfied", "very dissatisfied" and "no response" which were 15%, 5%, and 5% only remaining constant respectively.
Overall, as we have seen, it is evident that refurbishment had efficient for the number of visitors and their satisfaction.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85340314136 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.03904221448 2.65546596893 152% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581151832461 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.198512286 43.030603864 235% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 186.333333333 112.824112599 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8333333333 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25875868176 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174184874225 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100318109464 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170385476649 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757043864711 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 13.2329268293 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.09 61.2550243902 38% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 11.4140731707 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.