The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

The table illustrates the changes in the quantity of callers to Ashdown Museum prior to and after its decoration, while the pie charts reflect the attitudes from the inverviewees to the above museum among the same times.

There was an apparent increase in the visitors , which leaped from 74,000 to 92,000 in the table .

As for the pie charts , the same tendency had also been observed. In the year before the refurishment, 70% of the surveyed people expressed unsatisfied opinions,among which was 30% showed extreme dissatisfication . A quater of visitors reflected satisfaction, and 15% of them were crazy about this museum. When the upgraded engineering completed, a decline with 25% had been achieved in the unsatisfied figures, though there was increase of 10% in the ones of beyound dissatisfaction. Besides, the satisfied ones had been havled compared with past times,whereas one fifth growth could be observed in the proportion of really statisfied. Futhermore, the satistics showing no response stablized before and after the refurbishing programme.

To sum up, the number of vistors presents an upsurged tendency after the upgraded projoect .

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty of callers to Ashdown Museum prior to and after its decoration, while the pie ...
^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...was an apparent increase in the visitors , which leaped from 74,000 to 92,000 in t...
^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eaped from 74,000 to 92,000 in the table . As for the pie charts , the same ten...
^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... in the table . As for the pie charts , the same tendency had also been observe...
^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , among
...ed people expressed unsatisfied opinions,among which was 30% showed extreme dissatisf...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unsatisfied opinions,among which was 30% showed extreme dissatisfication . A quat...
^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...was 30% showed extreme dissatisfication . A quater of visitors reflected satisfac...
^^
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , whereas
...had been havled compared with past times,whereas one fifth growth could be observed in t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ged tendency after the upgraded projoect .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, really, so, whereas, while, as for, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43333333333 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13300953106 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7317607852 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251380256094 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886172328534 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428033878615 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118401399198 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545260285897 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.