One typical phenomenon of today is that the whole society is characterised by abundant options. Although many people deeply convince so, I am still holding the opposite view.
With no doubt, some advocates believe all of us are spoilt with so many choices that everyone will be indulged like an emperor. To begin with, there are more sources of food, drink and even groundbreaking items waiting to be selected by us. As a result, people may enjoy unlimited surprises comparing with older generation. The next point is that innovations in the medicines could eliminate fatal diseases such as cancer, AIDS and so on out of lives, promoting each one to prolong their lives, or at least reducing the pain aroused from those. Besides, new occupations are tailored to meet new born requirements based on the individual personality.
There are, however, truths are not as what they like in the above discussions .On the one hand, innovated things generally ignite the curiosity beneath our souls, whereas seldom of us are likely to experience both restricted by the level of income and safe reasons. After all, we are prone to stay reasonable rather than risking. On top of that, were some of us torturing by those uncurable illness, medical selections would have be no noticeable progresses. Doctors in charge are inclined to choose the most stable and secured treatments as their first choice rather than the brand new ones, which reflects the actual dilemma that experiments are not equal to practical situation. Finally, those so called promising works are so rare that they are definitely not enough to solve the unemployment problems, especially in the financial crisis.
In conclusion , the difference between reality and fantasy are so clear that options are still limited in nowadays no matter from daily lives , medical breakthroughs or work positions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Although many people deeply convince so, I am still holding the opposite view. ...
^^
Line 4, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nate fatal diseases such as cancer, AIDS and so on out of lives, promoting each o...
^^
Line 6, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... what they like in the above discussions .On the one hand, innovated things genera...
^^
Line 6, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...hat they like in the above discussions .On the one hand, innovated things generall...
^^
Line 6, column 431, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... illness, medical selections would have be no noticeable progresses. Doctors in ch...
^^
Line 8, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the financial crisis. In conclusion , the difference between reality and fant...
^^
Line 8, column 104, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...so clear that options are still limited in nowadays no matter from daily lives , medical br...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 142, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d in nowadays no matter from daily lives , medical breakthroughs or work positions...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, however, if, may, so, still, whereas, after all, at least, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16171617162 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7492267609 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679867986799 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1686000587 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3076923077 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114279753117 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378597171923 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425182104454 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0595478745252 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290741122527 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.