The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry. The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are set up.
The table presents a prediction for the outlay of three projects for sustaining forestry over the next five years in America. The pie chart illustrates the anticipated proportion of expenses in year 1. Overall, the projects for West Africa and Central America are predicted to drop its costs as opposed to South-east Asia over the 5 year period.
West Africa is projected to drop its expenditure by 8 million dollars before its figure is likely to rise up by 1 million dollars in year 5. Similarly, the expense of South-east Asia project is predicted to increase by 30 million dollars for the last 3 years after decreasing by 10 million dollars from year 1 to year 2. In comparison, an anticipation for Central America project that there is an overall significant fall of its outlay by 15 million dollars.
It is clear in the pie chart that set-up costs will account for a half of the total expenses in year 1. Moreover, the projects are anticipated to spend 30% of its money on salaries, which is the second highest. Following that, 20% of the overall expenditure in year 1 will be comprised of trainings, which is doubled the expected figure for office expenses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: WILL_BE_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'will be composed of' or 'will comprise' or 'will consist of'?
Suggestion: will be composed of; will comprise; will consist of
...0% of the overall expenditure in year 1 will be comprised of trainings, which is doubled the expecte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74876847291 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76510497593 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522167487685 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4830467229 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.111111111 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430609947856 0.215688989381 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198010801181 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117163566399 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316422482871 0.15604864568 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952174202536 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.