The table below shows the results of a 25-year study on the use of bicycles in Britain by age and gender.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table shows the use of bicycles in the United Kingdom, stratified by both age groups and gender, over an interval of 25 years. Such presentation allows for conclusions about the temporal trend, the inherent age-related relationships, and the interaction of the two, if any.
Regarding age, across all the measuring points, bike use peaks nearly at the adolescence period; that is, with 11- to 17-year-olds. Such peak is significantly more pronunced in case of males, suggesting probably being a more common pastime for male children and adolescents.
As for the temporal pattern, however, even though cycling remains relatively constant for 18-59 adults, it declines sharply in case of most children and adolescent groups, as well as the elderly. As a result, the entirety of cyclists also sees around a 25 per cent decrease over the 25-year period.
To sum up, utilizing bikes, whether as a leisure activity or a means of transmission, is generally less at the end of the study. While their use among adults is relatively constant, nay increasing in case of male 18- to 59-year-olds, this decrease is explained by the plunge in use between kids and teenagers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, well, while, as for, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11458333333 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9751393233 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671875 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0390352901 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.75 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153283562774 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668405881748 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755683761279 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897146768048 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512385103004 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.