The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant
The table illustrates the proportion of pupils who gives high-grade ratings for several academic provision of a university due to a survey conducted in 3 different years of 2000, 2005 and 2010
In general, print resources were highly appreciated by the majority of undergraduates in this university in all 3 given years. Meanwhile, the percentage of students vote for building/teaching facilities remain unchanged in the period shown
As can be seen from the table, the print resources received the most excellent ratings from students in 3 years. In 2000, 87% of the students in the researched university considered this as good aspects, which nearly triple when compared to that of the range of modules offered as it merely 32%. Nevertheless, it was electronic resources that have the most significant increase in approval. Although initially 45% of total students giving it good ratings in the beginning, it eventually headed the list, equal to print resources at 87% in the final research year.
On the other hand, the building and teaching facilities in this university stayed constant at 77% during the survey while the teaching quality section, on the contrary, witnessed a substantial fluctuated. After a marginal decrease by from 65% in 2000 to 63% in 2005, the good ratings for this aspect rocketed up since 69% of students affirmed in its quality at the end of the survey
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, while, in general, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16740088106 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98938849199 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568281938326 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.8010299962 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.571428571 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4285714286 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101138477273 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045135567747 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482630165446 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728981216184 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575412880334 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.