The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.
Describe the information shown below in your own words. What implications do the indicators have for the countries?
Indicators Canada Japan Peru Zaire
Annual income per person (in $US) 11100 15760 160 130
Life expectancy at birth 76 78 51 47
Daily calorie supply per person 3326 2846 1927 1749
Adult literacy rate (%) 99 99 68 34
The table illustrates the social and economic indicators as per the United Nations statistics for the year 1994 for Canada, Japan, Peru and Zaire. Overall, the social and economic status of Japan and Canada is better when compared to Peru and Zaire.
To begin, income per person per year in Japan is about 15750 dollars and this number is somewhat similar in Canada with a difference of just over 4600 dollars. In both Peru and Zaire, annual income was around 160 dollars and 130 dollars . The proportion of educated people was largest in Japan and Canada accounting to 99% in both the countries. While the adult literacy rate in Peru was just over two-thirds whereas in Zaire it was 34%.
The social indicators, life expectancy and calorie intake per person followed the similar trend. The rate of life expectancy in Japan was 2% higher than that of Canada. This rate was just over half in Peru and below half in Zaire. Also, number of calories consumed per person was 3326 in Canada and 2846 in Japan. While this number was least in Zaire at around 1749 and 1927 in Peru. It is clear that the standard of living in Canada and Japan is far better than that of Peru and Zaire.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e was around 160 dollars and 130 dollars . The proportion of educated people was l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59241706161 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19413661677 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473933649289 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5115717249 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.75 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5833333333 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91666666667 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0778562064083 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358556592477 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082171359689 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824358283894 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099813581484 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.