The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for maunfacturers in the years 2006,2007,2014
The data source compares the percentage of 7 notebook computer producers in the global market in three different years 2006,2007 and 2014.
It is evident that HP was by far the leading manufacturer,while the opposite was true for Fujitsu.
As can be seen from the table, HP,Dell and Samsung ranked in the top three producers of this high-tech gizmo. In 2006, the market share of HP was in excess of 31% ,roughly doubling that of Dell and higher by nearly 20% than that of Samsung. During the next 8 years, the proportion of Dell and HP in the international market reflected a dramatic increase of 10% for the former and a small rise of about 4% for the latter. Meanwhile, Samsung sales dropped a mere minority of 1%, followed by a mild acceleration of roughly 4%.
Looking at the table in more details, the market share in the first year of Lenovo stood at the fourth place with 6.6.%,while that of Toshiba and Fujitsu was at the fifth and sixth with 6.2% and 4.8% respectively. Moreover, the data in 2014 showed that Toshiba surpassed Lenovo in terms of the market share and become the fourth well-known company in notepad industry with 1% higher and far beat Fujitsu. Over the period, other brands contributed less and less to the world market share at 22,8% in 2006, slightly decelerating to 19.3% in 2007 and plunging to 7,11% in the last year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...t HP was by far the leading manufacturer,while the opposite was true for Fujitsu. A...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Dell
...su. As can be seen from the table, HP,Dell and Samsung ranked in the top three pro...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the market share of HP was in excess of 31% ,roughly doubling that of Dell and h...
^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...market share of HP was in excess of 31% ,roughly doubling that of Dell and higher...
^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng that of Dell and higher by nearly 20% than that of Samsung. During the next 8 ...
^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Dell and HP in the international market reflected a dramatic increase of 10% f...
^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ternational market reflected a dramatic increase of 10% for the former and a sm...
^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arket reflected a dramatic increase of 10% for the former and a small rise of a...
^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...ovo stood at the fourth place with 6.6.%,while that of Toshiba and Fujitsu was at the ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a and Fujitsu was at the fifth and sixth with 6.2% and 4.8% respectively. Moreove...
^^
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssed Lenovo in terms of the market share and become the fourth well-known company...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd plunging to 7,11% in the last year.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, moreover, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69874476987 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63513302353 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564853556485 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4667215815 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.777777778 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5555555556 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33064735843 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123589004805 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1011733894 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186088477474 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117286201117 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.