The table describes the percentage of employers difficulty in recruiting employees in fourdifferent fields from 2003 to 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table describes the percentage of employers’ difficulty in recruiting employees in fourdifferent fields from 2003 to 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.

The table demonstrates three different challenges of employee recruitment in four distinctive areas (namely manufacturing, building, commerce, and services) between 2003 and 2004.
Overall, it is evident from the statistics that choosing a competent worker is considered by most employers to be their problem, whereas the opposite is true for finding those with good technical and managerial skills.
As regards the year 2003, it was reported that commerce ranked first regarding the challenge of recruiting skilled employees (with 47% of employers agreeing), followed by manufacturing, building, and services (45%, 42%, and 41% respectively). Concerning the difficulty in finding unskilled workers, employers in the area of manufacturing tend to find it the most challenging, with the figure registering at slightly above a quarter. For choosing technical and managerial staff, more employers in the field of building were found to face up to this challenge (14%), compared to a stark contrast of just 2% in the commerce field.
By 2004, it is noticeable that manufacturing had taken on the top position regarding the challenge of hiring skilled people (51%), while services and building had taken this place in finding unskilled and technical and managerial ones respectively. Also noteworthy is the fact that those issues tend to be less severe for job providers in the commerce sector, especially finding technical and managerial staff, with 0% recorded.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nical and managerial ones respectively. Also noteworthy is the fact that those issue...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, as regards

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5201793722 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08307623098 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578475336323 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.2453105627 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.857142857 112.824112599 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8571428571 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13107716186 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639839598017 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476538434124 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853859277265 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563229863881 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.2329268293 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.