Table showing the production of cocoa beans measure in tons in different regions(Asia, Africa, South America…etc).
The table illustrates the amounts of cacao beans that were produced in six global areas in the year 1992, 1994 and 1998.
Overall, cacao production increased in some areas and decreased in others. South America and Asia were the leading producers over the given period. Furthermore, The significant increase in cacao bean production was seen in Asia.
Between 1992 and 1998, the cacao bean production in South America rose from 1,43,000 tons to 3,89,000 tons and rising trends were also observed in Asia and Oceania, with increasing from 1,19,000 to 4,36,000 and from 40,000 to 76,840 tons respectively. Asia also had the higher output rate in each year peaking in 1998.
The trends for North and Central America, Africa and England fluctuated from 1992 to 1998. Africa and England cut their cacao bean production by 4,000 and 7,000 tons respectively, and Africa had the notably lowest figure in 1998. On the other hand, even though, small increases in production of the coffee bean were seen in North and Central America, the value remained the same in 1992 and 1998.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... year peaking in 1998. The trends for North and Central America, Africa and En...
^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'notably the lowest'.
Suggestion: notably the lowest
...0 tons respectively, and Africa had the notably lowest figure in 1998. On the other hand, even...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10055865922 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40767216223 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525139664804 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.0810556453 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.444444444 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24813910612 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111787056834 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469184867557 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153972856273 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462249823323 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.