The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table reveals the change in the figure for hectares of forested land in six different areas of the world.
Overall, it is crystal clear that Europe was always the highest nation which had the largest forested land. The opposite was true for the data of Oceania hit the bottom, compared other areas.
Looking at the period, how many forested land in millions of hectares in Europe increased steadily from 989 hectares in 1990 to 1001 hectares in 2005. The follow nation was the number of land in South America, stood at 964 hectares in 1990. After that, this figure drop slowly at 882 hectares in 2005. The maintain at the same hectares of Africa and North America, at around 790 hectares and 705 hectares respectively.
On the other hand, Oceania was the lowest area where had the data of forested land just only under 200 hectares in the period. The figure for forest in North American in 2000 and 2005 reach a plateau, at 705 hectares. While the data of forested land both in Asia and Europe increased, the number of hectares of forest in other areas declined.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...tares in 1990 to 1001 hectares in 2005. The follow nation was the number of land in South ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...re drop slowly at 882 hectares in 2005. The maintain at the same hectares of Africa and Nort...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66315789474 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22924406153 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521052631579 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5601302928 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.6 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213285283116 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966394535037 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678095477145 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145836401054 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678762952085 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.