The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901.
The given table demonstrates key data on the labor force in silk production in England and Wales over a 60-year period commencing from 1851.
Overall, it is evident from the statistics that the total number of workers in the industry experienced a steady decline during the time frame. Furthermore, there were more females involved in this activity than their counterparts in all of the given years.
In 1851, although there were fewer factories for production compared to the other years (just 272), this year witnessed the highest number of employees with 130750 people in total, in which 53964 were male and 76786 were female. After ten years, the number of silk factories nearly tripled, reaching 761. Nevertheless, the total number of employees fell by slightly above 30000 people.
Over the next 40 years, the figures for total workers in silk production went under a constant decrease, reaching a total number of 38942 at the end of the period. Those for silk factories, meanwhile, decreased a bit in 1871 and then rose marginally to 702 in 1881, before falling steadily to 623 in 1901. Also in this year, it is noticeable that the number of female workers almost doubled that of their counterparts, 25567 compared to 13375.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...his activity than their counterparts in all of the given years. In 1851, although there w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, nevertheless, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99514563107 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59069169843 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611650485437 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5597619041 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232755404413 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893949663644 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609139848499 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132944737228 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724264650863 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...his activity than their counterparts in all of the given years. In 1851, although there w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, nevertheless, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99514563107 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59069169843 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611650485437 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5597619041 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232755404413 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893949663644 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609139848499 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132944737228 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724264650863 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.