The table shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999
The table presents the percentage of people from each household type living in poverty in Australia in 1999. At first glance, it is evident that there were six household types living in poverty, accounting for 11 percent.
It can be seen from the table that the percentage of aged couples was the lowest of the six family types, at just under 5 percent. There were 54000 people living in poverty from single aged person and 211000 people who lived in poverty from family that has a couple and no children, accounting for 6 percent and 7 percent respectively.
The proportion of sole parents was the highest, occupying at just over 20 percent . The figure for single families that has no children was lower than sole parents by 2 percent, whereas there were 933000 people living in poverty from household type that has a couple with children, at 12 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in poverty, accounting for 11 percent. It can be seen from the table that the p...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 6 percent and 7 percent respectively. The proportion of sole parents was the h...
^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ghest, occupying at just over 20 percent . The figure for single families that has...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 717.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81208053691 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45424801789 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530201342282 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0297528718 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207509491375 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122278494246 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873982834136 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157175793066 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045076240692 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.