The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.
The given tabular chart reveals the information about the four different secondary schools attended by the learners from the year 2000 to 2009. The data is calibrated in per centum.
It can be seen that, In the year of 2000 voluntary controlled schools were attended by 52℅ of the students. However, the per centum of pupils who had attended this school in the next nine years had been decreased. Meanwhile, 12℅ learners went to community schools and 24℅ learners had gone to Grammer schools. In addition to this, attendance of specialists schools in the years: 2000, 2005 and 2009 was 12℅, 11℅ and 10℅ respectively.
As far as trend was concerned,in grammar schools the dramatic fall had been observed in the per centum of learners from the year 2000 to 2009. Along with this, every year only one per centum reduction was observed in specialists schools for pupils attendance since the year 2000. Surprisingly, in the year of 2005 and 2009 per centum of students who had gone to community schools were 32℅ and 58℅ respectively.
Overall, it is evident that the huge decrease was observed in attendance of learners in all schools except community schools.Moreover, community schools were least attended by the students in starting year, but in the last year of given period these schools were attended by maximum pupils.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...tively. As far as trend was concerned,in grammar schools the dramatic fall had ...
^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...As far as trend was concerned,in grammar schools the dramatic fall had been obser...
^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...in all schools except community schools.Moreover, community schools were least attended ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06306306306 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7311862436 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.50165287 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.4 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25606821571 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123800814293 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730685740042 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189647385387 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040708421239 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.