The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given data provides the information about the percentage of students who attended four different secondary schools from 2000 to 2009.
Overall, the attendance of pupils was more in voluntary controlled schools in the given period whereas, the least attendance can be seen in specialist school in the same years.
With regard to community schools, the percentage of schools increased between 2000 and 2009. In 2000,only 12% learners went to community schools, which rose to 32% and 58% in 2005 and 2009 respectively. Moreover, the pupils who attended specialist schools decreased by 1% in 2005 and 2009.
In contrast, the attendance of students in grammar schools and voluntary centered schools followed the same trend. In 2000, only 24% pupils attended the grammar school, which ,however decreased to 122% in 2009. Similarly, 52% students in 2000 were interested in voluntary controlled schools which lowered by 14% in 2005 and again dropped by 7% in 2009.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pecialist school in the same years. With regard to community schools, the pe...
^^^^
Line 6, column 175, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...upils attended the grammar school, which ,however decreased to 122% in 2009. Simil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, similarly, whereas, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2987012987 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75927421581 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512987012987 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.669452384 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268342653353 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136627742336 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529916321084 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173687055263 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368961465285 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.