As a country develops, people tend to buy more cars. Do the advantages for individual outhweigh the disadvantages for the environment?

Essay topics:

As a country develops, people tend to buy more cars. Do the advantages for individual outhweigh the disadvantages for the environment?

Undoubtedly, the mortals of developed nations prefer to buy more cars as they want to live in comfortable life. Although, it is beneficial for them, but its negative impacts on atmosphere could not be overlooked.

To begin with, In the progressed countries, the people tend to buy many cars due to plethora of reasons. The human beings can go anywhere at any time in their cars in few minutes instead of waiting public transportation which take longer time because it stops in several places. Furthermore, some persons do not feel comfortable while traveling in local vehicles due to great congestion of passengers and therefore they suffer from suffocation and vomiting. Also, they believe in discriminations and do not want to go with those who are from different region, religion and caste. Last but not least, the people think that if the whole family want to travel, the car is finding cheaper as compared to pay fares in public vehicles.

On the other hand, the more number of cars are proven to be harmful for environment. A the cars emit pollutants which are adding in ecosystem and causing so many problems for well-being and animals. Moreover, the harmful gases produced from cars are also resulting global warming due to which the temperature is not getting stable. The global warming is also inhibit rainfall and hence, drought like issues are also taking birth.

In conclusions, I opine that the demerits of cars are more than the merits for human beings. As the air is getting impure also put the life of mankind in danger.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on atmosphere could not be overlooked. To begin with, In the progressed countri...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...t to travel, the car is finding cheaper as compared to pay fares in public vehicle...
^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'A' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: A; The
...e proven to be harmful for environment. A the cars emit pollutants which are adding i...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rature is not getting stable. The global warming is also inhibit rainfall and hen...
^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'inhibited'.
Suggestion: inhibited
...ing stable. The global warming is also inhibit rainfall and hence, drought like issues...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... like issues are also taking birth. In conclusions, I opine that the demerit...
^^^^
Line 8, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... more than the merits for human beings. As the air is getting impure also put the ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91221374046 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68994083845 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599236641221 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7534883701 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14129725702 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053963745801 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490214144402 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090787408548 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015740035714 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.