The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words
The table demonstrates the global marketing of cellphones brands in two years.
From a simple recognition to the provided information, it is apparent that Nokia company was the market leader in both consecutive years. Furthermore, Motorola was the second successful seller in 2005 and 2006.
In 2005, Nokia cellphone’s share in markets was 32.5 percent, while Motorola involved 17.7 percent share of total market. nokia’s share amount increased to 35 % in 2006 as the same 2 percent growth of Motorola. while the Samsung’s portion of market declined from 12.7% in 2005 to 11.8% in 2006.
it is considerable that despite of growth of Sony Ericsson’s market share from 6.3 % to 7.4%, other entrepreneurs market like L.G and benq mobile declined. L.G’s share decreased a negligible amount from 6.7% to 6.3 but benq mobile share declined to 2.4 in 2006.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nokia&apos
...ved 17.7 percent share of total market. nokia's share amount increased to 35 % in 200...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 222, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... the same 2 percent growth of Motorola. while the Samsung's portion of market de...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...om 12.7% in 2005 to 11.8% in 2006. it is considerable that despite of growth ...
^^
Line 13, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G
...7.4%, other entrepreneurs market like L.G and benq mobile declined. L.G's sh...
^
Line 13, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G&apos
...et like L.G and benq mobile declined. L.G's share decreased a negligible amount f...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a negligible amount from 6.7% to 6.3 but benq mobile share declined to 2.4 in 200...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 755.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 139.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43165467626 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43363162301 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13887280866 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604316546763 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.937162525 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.375 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211787117828 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105811812122 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381349253715 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131073555076 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366971069663 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.