The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labeled coffee and bananas in 1999and 2004 in five European countries.
The provided tables compare five nations in Europe (namely the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden) in terms of their selling of Fairtrade coffee and bananas in two separate years, 1999 and 2004.
Overall, it is evident that all mentioned countries experienced a rise in the sales of coffee in 2004, whereas only three out of five had a growth in their sales of bananas. Also, the UK was noticeably seen to have the highest levels of selling on the two products.
Looking at the information in more detail, in 1999, Switzerland was the nation with the highest sales of Fairtrade coffee (at 3 million euros), whilst revenue from bananas was highest in the UK, with 15 million euros. By the year 2004, however, sales of coffee in the UK experienced exponential growth to 20 million euros, over three times higher than Switzerland’s sales at the same time (6 million euros). The year 2004 also witnessed a dramatic increase in the revenue from Fairtrade bananas of the UK and Switzerland, with 47 and 5,5 million euros respectively.
As regards the other countries, revenues from coffee saw a slight increase in Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden, but still remained at 2 million euros or under. Concerning sales of Fairtrade bananas, there was a soar of nearly 3,5 million euros to 4 million euros in Denmark. By contrast, Belgium and Sweden were the only nations whose revenues reduced by half, standing at 1 and 0,9 million euros in 2004 respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, so, still, whereas, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89068825911 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70296814895 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518218623482 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.1284379142 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.222222222 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4444444444 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205495669656 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951834556586 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663216407094 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141815559877 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484094492871 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.