The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The given table below compares the earnings from banana and coffee labelled with FairTrade in 5 countries of Europe in two years: 1999 and 2004.
Overall, while it is clear that the Coffee grew significantly in demand in UK over the period, Switzerland was the dominant seller of banana in both years.
According to the first table, the greatest change is evident in the UK where 1.5 million euros worth of coffee were sold in 1999 and after a half decade, its sales escalated to 20 million. Similarly, the Switzerland sales doubled from 3 to 6 million euros between 1999 and 2004, while Belgium income from coffee soared by .7 million on top of 1 million over the same period. However, in 1999, it generated 1.8 million and 0.8 million in demark and Sweden respectively, which then rose by .2 million each in the next 5 years.
Moving to the FairTrade banana, the Switzerland predominated its sales among the 5 countries, with 15 million in 1999 and 47 million in 2004. Subsequently, the UK encountered fivefold increase in its earning from 1 million to around 5.5 million from 1999 to 2004, whereas Belgium grew in the same years from 0.6 to 4 million. In contrast, although Sweden and Demark spent 1.8 million and 2 million on banana in 1999, it dropped in 2004 to 1 and 0.9 million respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'tables'.
Suggestion: tables
The given table below compares the earnings from banana...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, similarly, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71615720524 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63923137076 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519650655022 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 19.192690666 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 135.0 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.625 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207963001971 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126473458053 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110406043667 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17450137889 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129796536869 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.