The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000, with an estimate of the situation in 2050. Summarise the information.
The tables compare the statistics regarding the World population from 1950 to 2050 and the percentage of people lived in six different territories, such as Africa, Asia, Latin America, North America, and Oceania. Overall, the total population in Asia was higher than the other regions from 1950 to 2050.
Now turning to the details, the total world inhabitants accounted for 2.5 billion in 1950, but after 50 years the number almost doubled at 6 billion, which is expected to rise from 6 to 9 billion by 2050. In 1950, the highest percentage of people estimated in Asia, at 56%, compared with Africa, Europe, Latin America, North America, and Oceania, while Oceania was at 1% and remained the same until 2050. After fifty years, the percentage increased only in Asia, Africa and Latin America calculated for 60%, 13%, and 9%, respectively, whilst in Europe and North America decreased counted at 12% and 5%. Nearly as many people lived in Africa as Europe in 2000.
It can be seen that, the distribution of the population is projected to grow in Africa, except it is likely to remain the same in Latin America. On the other hand, it kept continuing to decline in Asia, Europe, and North America by 1%, 5% and 1% by 2050.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77830188679 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53070763465 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537735849057 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4666660518 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.625 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148558248892 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730971198502 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420663153809 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112844832847 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395561465526 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.