The three Pie Charts below show the change in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001

Essay topics:

The three Pie Charts below show the change in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001

The given circular charts reveal the total expenditure of five different amounts for a UK school in 3 years: 1918 1, 1991, 2001. The data is calibrated in percentum. Which is clearly and coherently represented.
It can be seen that, during the year 1981 the change in amount total School expenditure in UK insurance was 2%.in addition to, had been chnge ta amount spending teacher salaries was 40%. however, the resources spending amount in UK was 15%. For example, books.furthermore, furniture and equipment expenditure expend was 15%.
As far as trend concered, during the year 1991 the changes the amount in UK school incurance was 3%.ratherthan, had been change the amount spending teacher salaries was 50%.either, and than the school spend amount on other resources was 20%. Example books. Moreover, had been furniture and equipment changes the amount spend in UK sochlia was 23%.,and than other resources spending the amount UK school was 9%, for example books.
Overall, during the years 1919, 1981 and 2001 the total amount spending increased the teacher salaries.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ount spending teacher salaries was 40%. however, the resources spending amount in UK w...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...salaries was 40%. however, the resources spending amount in UK was 15%. For examp...
^^
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore, furniture and equipment expenditure expend was 15%. As far as trend concere...
^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: AND_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...ng teacher salaries was 50%.either, and than the school spend amount on other resour...
^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
... the amount spend in UK sochlia was 23%.,and than other resources spending the amoun...
^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: AND_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...amount spend in UK sochlia was 23%.,and than other resources spending the amount UK ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al amount spending increased the teacher salaries.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for example, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21965317919 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7790306091 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508670520231 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.6118970146 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227500740316 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938839530511 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803133704915 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154209627368 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254319502093 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.