The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts provide information about the changes on how the budgets were spent in different sectors by a school of the UK in three particular years.
Overall,greatest amount was spent by the school in teachers' salaries while the least was spent on insurance.
As we can clearly see, 40% of the total amount was spent on teachers' salaries in 1981, which increased by 10% in a decade, but decreased by 5% in the next decade. Only 28% was allocated for the salaries of other workers in the starting year, which lowered to 22% in 1991 and fell down to less than a fifth at the end of the year.
The least amount of money was expended in insurance by the school administration in 1981 , which was only 2%. In 10 years time, a percent increment was seen in this sector. In another decennary, there was a gradual upliftment of 5% nn this sector.
The expenditure on furniture and equipment and resources such as book was equal, which was 15% in 1981. After 10 years, the expenditure on resources was higher than that on furnitures measuring 20%, which was more than 15% of the total amount spent on furniture. But, at the year 2001, the statistics fluctuated, as can be seen clearly. The expenditure spent for resources fell down by 11% but, the amount on furniture rose to about one-fourth of the total amount.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , greatest
...UK in three particular years. Overall,greatest amount was spent by the school in teach...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the greatest'.
Suggestion: , the greatest
...UK in three particular years. Overall,greatest amount was spent by the school in teach...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nce by the school administration in 1981 , which was only 2%. In 10 years time, a ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63404255319 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67781524462 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9565301938 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0821936280001 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393074715295 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662385355701 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698509913133 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858103118695 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.