As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
With the advancement and development of urban area, transportation system is also developing. However people argue that goverments should focus on developing the public transportation rather than expanding raods, helpful for privaye transportations. I completely go with the statement and think that government should build railway stations.
On the one hand, development of the roads reduces the traffic, shortening the time of travel. The widening of the road decreases the density of vehicles which helps people to drive without any stoppage. Furthermore, majority of accidents take place everyday due to the unmanaged and damaged roads. With the proper repairement of roads, accidents are less to happen, accessing people to drive without any problems. In addition to that, public transportation won't be crowded as people will travel by their own means.
On the other hand, development transportation such as railway station eases people in many ways as they are cheap and more convenient. For instance, looking at the context of our country, majority of people are not able to afford their own private vehicle. So, travel via public transportation. Developments of public means can be a boon to many people. Moreover, railways can be useful for travelling long distances as they are fast, comfortable and safe. Also, development of roads increase the number of private vehicles, causing more pollution and more consumption of fuel. This degrades the nature as well as its resources.
To conclude, governments should emphasize on developing the public transportations rather than the development of roads for private vehicles because public transportation is convenient, cheap and causes less pollution than cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ansportation system is also developing. However people argue that goverments should foc...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, look, moreover, so, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56653992395 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12455927295 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577946768061 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9639656427 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237440528738 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720862547269 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644177512167 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162181530264 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547631329326 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.