The pie charts shown below, depict the proportion of disparate expenses in a particular school in the UK in three different years with ten years apart from each other. The costs constituting of teachers and staff's salaries, insurance and physical resources and equipment seem to be commensurate during 1981 to 2001.
As obviously seen from charts, teachers' salaries dedicated mainly large portion among other factors with almost half of school's costs. This school had devoted 40% of its cost in 1981 to wage payments for teachers and increased it to half of its expenses but reduced it again to 45%; the same procedure of dedicating expenses that we can witness in costs of resources such as books with 15% and 20% in 1981 and 1991 respectively and a drastic reduction in 2001 by 11%.
On the contrary, the school authorities had decided to assign 13% of their budget on furniture while it dwindled to 5% dramatically and ten years later it burst to 23% abruptly. On the other hand we observe a steady change in staff's income and insurance with constant increase in insurance from 2% to 8% and a steady reduction rate in staff's wages from 28% , 22% and eventually 15% at the end of 2001.
In conclusion, despite all the altering proportion among diverse factors, at one glance, it seems that thee aggregate proportion of these factors remained stable over the period with maximum portion for teachers' salaries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... reduction rate in staffs wages from 28% , 22% and eventually 15% at the end of 20...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, apart from, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9125 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6559322927 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591666666667 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.3089733768 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.428571429 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2857142857 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 5.23603664747 246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13199958767 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060811881984 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529391029226 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782329368989 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658921945001 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.