Nowadays, according to centralization of job opportunities and welfare in the cities and invasion of growing population to live in big cities and their vicinity, most of urban and even suburban areas have commenced to sprawl widely. In this way extending distances between destinations is the inevitable result of this phenomenon leads to need for improved roads and railways. Spending money on either roads or railways is a widely debated issue that I try to delve its pros and cons in the following essay.
To begin with, the incredible growth of private transportation accompanies with a hefty amount of disadvantages, including traffic congestion or detrimental environmental effects such as air pollution; the irrefutable fact which both opponents and adherents of venture mainly on the roads, alike do concur with that. Additionally, safety and human mistakes during driving is another factor that jeopardizes the health and security of people. The high rate of fatal accidents is the salient and tangible example.
On the flip side, launching, refinement and maintenance of public transportation methods such as railways require the adequate financial backing from governments. This expenditure not only constitute of establishing its infrastructure and equipping railways with the best standardized facilities, but also comprise of better quality and quantity of public vehicles, simultaneously. For instance, just only in affluent cities we could use high-qualified public transportation and exploit the punctual services with spacious compartments frequently. Furthermore, in mega cities such as Tehran long distances makes it unaffordable to commute with public transportation; so in some occasions, the railways are not considered as economic options.
In a nutshell, it seems that the disadvantages of investment on railways are eclipsed by its advantages in the sense that with a long-term effective scheme, government authorities can harness the power of railways in order to declining pollution, traffic and safety perils.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
... best standardized facilities, but also comprise of better quality and quantity of public v...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quality and quantity of public vehicles, simultaneously. For instance, just only ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71475409836 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33135406614 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64262295082 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.2386429869 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.454545455 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169311436481 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531154483819 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416828711747 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916830867252 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0065373808857 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.