The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
There are three differential pie charts compare annual school expenses in 1981, 1991 and 2001 by choosing particular school in UK. In the 1981, teacher’s salaries were a major proportion of school spending (40%). Buying resources, equipment and furniture, both, together had same shares of total expenses (15%). Also, it should be noted that salaries of workers included 28% of total school spending. The remain share belonged to insurance expenses (2%) which was imperceptible.
Based on the second pie chart, in 1991, amount of money was spent on salaries of teachers, insurance and buying resources were increased (50%/3%-20%). On the contrary, expenses which were related to workers’ salaries and buying furniture and equipment were decreased (22%-5%).
The last chart showed that school was declined the salaries of teachers (45%), worker (15%) and buying resource (9%). It is immediately apparent that school was tend to spend money in buying equipment and furniture (23%) and insurance (8%).
To wrap it up, insurance and furniture and equipment were going to be important for school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... included 28% of total school spending. The remain share belonged to insurance expenses 2%...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...is immediately apparent that school was tend to spend money in buying equipment and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3567251462 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79365728915 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.5364149767 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2562061567 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111740104698 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160647126599 0.0843802449381 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141085350272 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106663129607 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.