The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts illustrate the percentage of school spending on 5 categories in a particular school in the UK from 1981 to 2001.

Overall, the expenditure on teachers' salaries in all years were the highest proportion which were much higher than spending on insurance. In addition, the figure for other workers’ salaries decreased over the observed period.

spending on teachers ‘ salaries accounted for the largest proportion of expense, with 40% in 1981, 50% in 1991 and 45% in 2001. While the expenditure on insurance increased from 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001, the figure for other workers ‘ salaries decreased from 28% to 15% during the period.

In 1981, the spending on Resources eg books and furniture and equipment were equal, with 15%.

The figure for Resouces eg books increased to 20% in 1991 then dropped to 9% in 2001. By contrast, the expenditure on furniture and equipment decreased to 5% in 1991 and it accounted for 23% of the total expense in 2001.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Spending
...ecreased over the observed period. spending on teachers ' salaries accounted f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from 28% to 15% during the period. In 1981, the spending on Resources eg bo...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05454545455 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78777338404 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9828669511 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160819336876 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851465444452 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859994258977 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113311516995 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095688214942 0.0819641961636 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.