The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given charts compare the changes of annual expense by a particular English school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts displayed that the school spent the most budget on teachers’ salaries. In 1981, the total money spent was 40% and increased to 50% in 1991; however, it was cut to 45% in 2001. On the other hand, the least amount of money was spent on insurance in all three years (1981, 1991, 2001), where none exceeded 9%.
Although the school spent most of its expenditure on teachers’ salaries, the amount allocated to other workers’ salaries decreased from 1981 (28%), to 1991 (22%), and 2001 (15%). In other categories, expenses for furniture and equipment showed some fluctuation over the years, where it reduced from 15% to 5% in 1981 to 1991, but lastly showed a rise to 23% in 2001. A fluctuation occurs similarly to resources such as books, where 15% of the school’s expenditure was spent in 1981. Despite an increase in 1991 to 20%, the school cut it’s expense on resources to 9% in 2001.
Overall, the school spent a significant amount of expenditure on teachers’ salaries, however other workers’ salaries were spent a lot less. While insurance was spent on the least, other resources and furniture and equipment fluctuated in all three years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, similarly, so, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99539170507 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86904759335 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497695852535 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4081779803 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216387467393 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113787400309 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784112888752 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173332773402 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100949500451 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.