The circular chart compare the total expenditure of five different amounts of UK schools in three years: 1981, 1991, and 2001. The data is calibrated in percentum. It is clearly and coherent representation.
To begin with, there was a one fourth percent of teachers salaries, and spent on insurance had been a tiny fraction. Moreover, the salaries of other employees was a more than quarter percent in 1981. Workers salaries had been declining in 2001, at a five percent to less than five percent . Furniture and equipment, and resources was same, in 1981 at less than five percent. (Respectively)
Secondly, the salaries of teachers were half percent at during the year 1991 and 45% in 2001. The changes in insurance was 3% in 1991, and 8% in 2001. Moving further, furniture and equipment was one in twenty percent in the time period of 1991, and than a quarter percent in period of 2001. The changes in salaries of other workers had been decreased at 22% to 15%, and resources were fallen at 20% to 9% .
Overall, it is evident that, the changes in spending was increased in the salaries of teachers at 5% to 10% during the given period, and the changes in spending, had been decreased the salaries of other workers at 6% to 7% in the year, 1981, and 2001.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies had been declining in 2001 at a five percent to less than five percent . Furn...
^^
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... five percent to less than five percent . Furniture and equipment, and resources ...
^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: AND_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...percent in the time period of 1991, and than a quarter percent in period of 2001. Th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., and resources were fallen at 20% to 9% . Overall, it is evident that, the chang...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, secondly, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64864864865 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60712756845 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445945945946 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 0.482926829268 1657% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.958832044 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134611636802 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622974568553 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703926749563 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110032682063 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055011916564 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.