The three pie charts show below the changes in annual spending by particular UK school in 1981,1991 and2001.
The given pictorial charts reveal the information about variation in annual expenditure by British school during the 1981,1991 to after 10 years in the ( 2001). The data is calibrated in percentum. It is clear and coherent representation.
Overall it is evident that, the most significantl spent money maximum in the teacher payments by three pie chart. Which is far ahead of other terms. While was spent minimum on the insurance.
As obviously seen from, the pie chart data in the year 1981. It obeserved that, the united kingdom school was spent amount of four - fifth of total cost for teacher salaries. Moreover, resources and furniture equipment were spent money 15 percentum respectively. Further more, the least amount expenditure an insurance just under two percentum. In addition to this, the amount of 26 percentum was being spent for other worker salaries.
On the other hand, in the year 1991 and 2001 the teacher salaries were being expenditure cost of upsurged 45% and 50% proportion respectively. Apart from that, insurance had inclined (3and less than one- tenth of total amount) in the year 1991and 2001 before the year 1981. As manifested, in the circular chart, a significant difference in the school expenditure money can be observed in the figure other worker payment and resources; in the year 1991 the amount spent was slightly difference 22 and 20 proportion. As far as considered school spent money on equipment only five percent from the year 1991, as opposed to the year 2001, which spent 23% .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rial charts reveal the information about variation in annual expenditure by Briti...
^^
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g the 1981,1991 to after 10 years in the 2001. The data is calibrated in percentu...
^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...money maximum in the teacher payments by three pie chart. Which is far ahead of o...
^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'chart' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
...m in the teacher payments by three pie chart. Which is far ahead of other terms. Whi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e teacher payments by three pie chart. Which is far ahead of other terms. While was ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...art. Which is far ahead of other terms. While was spent minimum on the insurance. ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the year 1981. It obeserved that, the united kingdom school was spent amount o...
^^
Line 7, column 481, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'differenced'.
Suggestion: differenced
...year 1991 the amount spent was slightly difference 22 and 20 proportion. As far as conside...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 649, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...pposed to the year 2001, which spent 23% .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while, apart from, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0796812749 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7215555588 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545816733068 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.8649250432 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7333333333 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139501815247 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486592377227 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625423071346 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10075521257 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357265543755 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.