The importance of providing aid to the poor nations by rich countries is essential for their growth which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, rich nations help poorer nation because of mutual benefits and this appears to be more ration. This essay will further elaborate my views of favoring the positive impact.
Analyzing the statement and explaining further, the first and foremost reason behind this is that, it is inter-exchanging of natural and human resources which benefits both the nations. Another striking benefit is that this reduces unemployment, poverty and rate of crime. Categorically discussing, it cannot be ignored that the main reason behind this is that it is a strong step and gateway towards globalization.
Probing ahead, one of the main underlying reasons stems from the fact that rich countries become super power and poor country gets. Moving further, it is pertinent to mention that rich nations have ample of resources and even their citizens enjoy good social and economic standards. Moreover, health, science, education and trade are the pillars for the progress of the nation which is required both by rich and poorer countries. Apart form the reasons mentioned above, it can be clearly stated that why many are in favor of this trend.
To conclude, according to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of global development are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: APART_FORM[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'apart from'?
Suggestion: Apart from
...ired both by rich and poorer countries. Apart form the reasons mentioned above, it can be ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, so, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 5.60731707317 482% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24719101124 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75128751044 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 106.607317073 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591760299625 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8044898764 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0193457370038 0.215688989381 9% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00669086949679 0.103423049105 6% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0119555267003 0.0843802449381 14% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0105690863682 0.15604864568 7% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00691402630667 0.0819641961636 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 40.7170731707 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.