The two chart below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in canada in 2005 and 2010.
The pie chart compares the online shoopping sales for retail sectors in Canada between 2005 and 2010. On the whole, the percentage of watered-up there was escalation and regression for every goods and services category.
In 2005, this country sales electronics and appliance stood at 35%. However, for selling the home furnishings finish at 25%. At 22%, food and baverages was the third most higher to online sales. Initially, video games was fairly low, at only 18%.
In 2010, food and baverages had the highest to sales which was 32%, 2% distinction with electronic and appliance which had value of 32%. For video games obtained for 23%, advance to one level from the previous comparison year. Next, home furnishings droped to the lowest for 15%.
Finally, the extremely popular retail sphere was food and baverages went up rapidly in last season than year before. electronic and appliance was slightly decreased with little quarell. The opposite of video games, uplifted to one grade with home furnishings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...t 22%, food and baverages was the third most higher to online sales. Initially, video games...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Electronic
...apidly in last season than year before. electronic and appliance was slightly decreased wi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, third, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18787878788 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50967640658 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624242424242 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2410790698 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.3333333333 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.75 22.9334400587 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22186539069 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842212523263 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13856377607 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150420359274 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134808463398 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 61.2550243902 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.