The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The two maps below illustrate changes of the road lead to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. it can be clearly seen from two maps that there were many change to make the way to access to hospital became more convenient.
According to the first map, there was a bus stop located far from the hospital at the east while in font of hospital rd was a cross road lead to city road. In addition, the hospital surrounded by ring road with a car park for civilian and staff on the right of the hospital rd.
By contrast, in 2010, the bus stop were upgraded to a bus station and they moved it to near the city hospital while the hospital rd were located between two roundabout more over, it connected directly to the bus station by two entrance way. Furthermore, the old car park divided to two particular car park, one for public was next to the ring road from the east, and the other one for staff was located at the old car park was.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. it can be clearly seen from two maps that ...
^^
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun change seems to be countable; consider using: 'many changes'.
Suggestion: many changes
...arly seen from two maps that there were many change to make the way to access to hospital b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ocated between two roundabout more over, it connected directly to the bus station...
^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'park' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
... car park divided to two particular car park, one for public was next to the ring ro...
^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one for public was next to the ring road from the east, and the other one for sta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 757.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.22905027933 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21336241736 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486033519553 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.5317765318 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235601444471 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154942391303 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109060414748 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196142851019 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0970049627088 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.85 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.