The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the amount of a particularly nation ‘s exports in some categories from 2015 to 2016 while the table describes the proportion change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with the year before.
Overall, there was an upward trend in almost categories.
According to the chart, in 2015, the value export of petroleum products came top with just over 60 dollar while engineered goods was not far behind with approximately 55 billion dollar. In addition, the amount of export in “gems and jewellery “and “agricultural products” were above of 40 billion dollar and 30 billion dollar respectively whereas textiles came bottom with over 25 billion dollar, this figure was about two time as low as the largest.
Meanwhile, in 2016, petroleum products and engineered goods ‘s export value had the same number (about 60 billion dollar) whilst “agricultural products” and “gems and jewelry” kept the same number in comparison with the year before ‘ number. Furthermore, there was a significant rise in the amount of textiles export from about 25 to over 30 billion dollar.
Finally, the percentage change in amount of export in each categories increased expect of gems and jewellery.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('particularly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('nation') instead of another adjective.
The chart illustrates the amount of a particularly nation 's exports in some categories from...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...eum products came top with just over 60 dollar while engineered goods was not far behi...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st 'agricultural products' and 'gems and jewelry' kept the sa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, so, well, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45918367347 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1282625618 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.685835694 43.030603864 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.857142857 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202869096983 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125535159829 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125154885035 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151550880993 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134605520465 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.