The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and repoting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pictures illustrate the alterations that took place at city hospital during a three-year period between 2007 and 2010.
It is noticeable from the maps that Ring Road, Hospital Road and City Road remained unchanged in terms of size and position throughout the given period. In contrast, the biggest change was the construction of separated car parks for staff and public. At the same time, bus stop had completely disappeared by 2010.
There was a construction of a roundabout in the southern area of the Ring Road while another one appeared at the conjunction of City Road and Hospital Road. In addition, six bus stops were demolished to make way for a bus station situated to the west of Hospital Road and connected with two roundabouts.
Car park for staff was located at the place where car park for both staff and public used to be. Meanwhile, a public car park, which is bigger in size compared to staff car park, was built in the east corner of Ring Road.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 5, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Car) must be used with a third-person verb: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
...nd connected with two roundabouts. Car park for staff was located at the place wher...
^^^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: bigger
... Meanwhile, a public car park, which is bigger in size compared to staff car park, was built i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71176470588 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60529803567 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5816019038 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173263495993 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803433010814 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614148341014 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117682646893 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537721406932 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.