The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisions where relevant.

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisions where relevant.

The information regarding the changes in roadway which leads to the city hospital in year 2007 and 2010 in depicted by the profferred Maps.

Overall, the hospital road underwent significant modifications with the inclusion of certain sophisticated amenities such as bus station and separate parking areas for staff and public, leading to its complete refurbishment.

To begin with, In year 2007, there was a straight road to the city hospital, which was altered by developing two roundabouts : one in the north side and other in south direction, in 2010.The old bus stops were replaced, by incorporating new advanced bus station, on the west side of hospital road.

Probing further, in past, there was a small car park area for both public and staff members, which often results in overcrowdedness.Therefore, in 2010, separate car park areas were in corporated for the staff and public.public car park was constructed on the east side of the city hospital, and for the staff it was made in east direction of hospital road opposite to bus station.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 188, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...e and other in south direction, in 2010.The old bus stops were replaced, by incorpo...
^^^
Line 19, column 18, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...hospital road. Probing further, in past, there was a small car park area for bo...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
... which often results in overcrowdedness.Therefore, in 2010, separate car park areas were ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, therefore, as for, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25581395349 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25575693543 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 22.4926829268 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.0308935146 43.030603864 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 226.0 112.824112599 200% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 43.0 22.9334400587 187% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 5.23603664747 286% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137224773566 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100654737678 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535677872868 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100654737678 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535677872868 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.8 13.2329268293 187% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.29 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 10.3012195122 183% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.12 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.9970731707 175% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.