two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010
These two diagrams depict the transformational developments of a road enter to a city hospital that changed the appearance of the roadway structure and related facilities in 2010 compared to 2007.
As can be noticed from the maps, city planners, first of all, introduced two roundabouts that substituted simple unsafe crossroads. The first one was situated in the interspersion of City Road and Hospital Rd with the aim to ease the intense traffic from the north of the hospital, while the second roundabout was constructed adjacently to the hospital itself, reducing the speed and, consequently, likelihood of accidents and possible injuries.
Beside the mention changes, that increased safety of the hospital visitors and passerbys, some other transformations were not of less importance. The area from the west of Hospital Rd that previously had hosted 3 bus stops gave the way to a wide bus station in a close proximity to the hospital entrance, meaning that visitors were granted with the convenient spot to wait for a public transport to stop. What is more, the parking facilities were significantly extended, since the narrow room right beneath the hospital entrance from the Ring Road being the parking spot for both staff and public automobiles in the past turned into a staff car park only. Whereas new area east of the hospital became the parking facility for public vehicles.
Overall, the asformantioned changes better served the need not only of the city hospital visitors but all the members of the roadtraffic in the area next to the hospital. Increased safety and well-developed infrastructure were also the results of introduced developments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed facilities in 2010 compared to 2007. As can be noticed from the maps, city pl...
^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...gave the way to a wide bus station in a close proximity to the hospital entrance, meaning that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'public transport'.
Suggestion: public transport
...ed with the convenient spot to wait for a public transport to stop. What is more, the parking faci...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, well, whereas, while, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23220973783 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04169199516 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569288389513 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 283.868780488 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.8755069017 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.222222222 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.23603664747 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213124191456 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870822395006 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769912438884 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145427887949 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858143639355 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.