The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps illustrated some changes in the way people enter a city hospital in two different years, 2007 and 2010
Overall, after three years, there was much supplementation of traffic infrastructure and accesses in 2010. Especially, there was the emergence of roundabouts, separate parking, and new construction of the bus station.
In 2010, there was the appearance of two new roundabouts. The first one was built at the three-way junction of the hospital road and the ring road surrounding City Hospital, the second one was situated at the four-way intersection of the city road and the hospital road. Six bus stops at either side of the hospital road in 2007 were be altered for erecting bus station toward the southwestern in 2010. In front of the new bus station, a mixed-car park was displaced by a car park for staff only, the public car park was constructed next to the right of City Hospital.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ither side of the hospital road in 2007 were be altered for erecting bus station tow...
^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... side of the hospital road in 2007 were be altered for erecting bus station toward...
^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2010. In front of the new bus station, a mixed-car park was displaced by a car pa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 754.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86451612903 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90749506886 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541935483871 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7910508258 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197602836412 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100653876938 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752351088509 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148938336702 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788254329469 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.