The two maps below show the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The two maps illustrate how the road leading to the city hospital was transformed during the period of three years from 2007 to 2010.
In 2007, the hospital road was straight after intersection, going to the north, which has bus stops on both sides. In the following 3 years road was developed to complex ramification system, what possibly reduced the traffic jams on the way to hospital.
First of all, car park underwent some changes: it was expanded, and public car parking was located in the eastern of hospital, driving the ring road. The stuff park remained on the same position: the first exit on the second roundabout and turn right to the parking. All these transformations provide sparer place for drivers. As can be seen from the second map, the hospital road began to start and end with two roundabouts, those helped to disperse the road flow especially in rush hour.
In addition, six bus stops were knocked down and developed into united bus station, just after city road crossed with first roundabout, on the west of Hospital road. It, in turn, facilitated the way to citizens find the right bus stop for each transport.
In conclusion, the developers transform the Hospital road access infrastructure significantly, chopping down the traffic jams and revitalizing the work of public transportation system.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03636363636 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79933581261 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595454545455 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8463387252 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175748111866 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706839741996 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721214046776 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113251067402 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620048632247 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.