The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
The given maps below compares the road transport infrastructure leading to city hospital in two years: 2007 and 2010.
Overall, it is clearly from the maps that transport by road to hospital was improved by the addition of roundabouts, a separate public car park and a bus station at the expense of bus stops.
According to the 2007 map, the hospital was accessible through hospital road that is connected to the ring road in the north end and city road to the south. The bus stops are located to the left and right of the hospital road and to the east end of it, there is a shared car parking area between public and staff.
From the renovation of transport system in 2010, the most important change that is noticeable is the construction of roundabouts at each junction of hospital road with ring road and city road. Moreover, the bus stops on the left and right side of hospital road were demolished to make a place for newly constructed bus stations to the west side of the hospital road. However, the car parking to the east of the hospital was dedicated for staff use only whereas for the public, a new parking area was added to the west of the hospital across the ring road.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5488372093 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47752035005 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451162790698 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.9906104816 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 139.714285714 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7142857143 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408742109408 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228390551631 0.103423049105 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161832060657 0.0843802449381 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297907604981 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149875661537 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.