The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps illustrate road access to city hospital in two different years 2007 and 2010.
In both the years map ring road is surrounded by city hospital and city road is connected to hospital through hospital road. Location of bus stop in different in year 2007 and 2010. To manage traffic roundabout is added in year 2010. Also parking area for public is changed in year 2010.
First major change is car park, in year 2010 map public car park is located east of hospital and staff car park is located east of hospital main road which was same area for both public and staff car park in year 2007. Other, major change is about bus stop which was present on both sides of hospital road but in year 2010 dedicated area is provided to west of hospital road.
One of addition in year 2010 is two roundabout one on ring road near hospital and other on city road. These roundabouts connect city road, bus station, ring road and hospital road.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...affic roundabout is added in year 2010. Also parking area for public is changed in y...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48837209302 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12463212226 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418604651163 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.3725967362 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7777777778 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277679592501 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159069939313 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103832997515 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241911103132 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904961405675 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.51 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...affic roundabout is added in year 2010. Also parking area for public is changed in y...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48837209302 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12463212226 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418604651163 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.3725967362 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7777777778 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277679592501 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159069939313 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103832997515 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241911103132 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904961405675 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.51 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.