The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps describe a transport system of a city hospital over a 3-year period. Overall, a road accessibility to this place has become more better than it used to be in 2007.
First of all, I could not help mentioning that staff obtained their own parking lots. Needless to say that employees had problems with getting to their working place since there was difficult to find a free space. Secondly, the Hospital road was upgraded due to the fact that 2 roundabout appeared. As a result, traffic jams became less frequent. It is convenient not only for people, but also for the staff of this hospital since they are able to be on time at their working place. The last, but not the least, a crossroad of the hospital road and the city road was unloaded by a roundabout too. Consequently, automobiles can move without any stops.
To sum up, all main above mentioned changes upgrade improved access to the hospital and made the work of this place more effective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... accessibility to this place has become more better than it used to be in 2007. First of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67251461988 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54839281515 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66081871345 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5465734054 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159748048164 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623283649704 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623132631449 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124139715383 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554073316877 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.