the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The given maps illustrate a comparison in the way linking to a city hospital between 2 different years: 2007 and 2010
As we can see, after 3 years there were some noticeable changes around the Hospital Road which is the main path to a city hospital in the centre of the map. However, the Ring Road and City road remained unchanged.
In 2007, there were several bus stops along the Hospital Road while 3 years after that, all of that bus stops were removed to make way for one large bus station on the Western side. Moreover, there was an addition of two roundabouts, one was located in the three-way intersection between Ring Road and Hospital Road and another was constructed in the crossroad of Hospital Road and City Road.
Further to the East, the Car park also had a striking change. In 2007 the car park situated on the right of Hospital Road was used for both staff and public. However, in 2010, the new car park was constructed for people to easily access via the Ring Road while the old one was only available for staff.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ssroad of Hospital Road and City Road. Further to the East, the Car park also had a st...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51063829787 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34839070139 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526595744681 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.490775217 43.030603864 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.142857143 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254974904008 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118332823858 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789549891994 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174542742709 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550205054248 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.