The two maps show the changes in the town of Denham from 1986 to the present day.
The maps represent about the changes which are came in the urban area of Denham from 1986 to present decade.
To begin with, by analysing the map of 1986, it is clear that, there were more farmlands which are completely demolished in present time and also new accommodations are constructed on those farmlands. In the north west direction, there were shops which are completely removed by building more houses. In addition, the post office, bridge in north-east direction and river stoke which is come from north-east direction to south, these are still remained in the urban area since 1986 to contemporary settings.
Moreover, in east direction, there was a large house with gardens which is converted into retirement home and gardens are removed by adding some new houses on that. Apart from that, primary school in north-east direction, is remained with little change, as few novel homes are constructed near to it. And along with the road in the town, a circular extension is made with houses.
Overall, there are large number of homes construct which are replaced many places especially farmlands. However, there are also few places which are remain constant in the town of Denham since 1986 to the present days.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...s represent about the changes which are came in the urban area of Denham from 1986 t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...er, there are also few places which are remain constant in the town of Denham since 19...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, so, still, apart from, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0197044335 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55768935858 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546798029557 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2549147996 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.222222222 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194957188489 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939917149434 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115092342085 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160824877889 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121148313712 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.