The two maps show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The given maps illustrate how an island has developed by building some tourist facilities on it.
Overall, the island has been evolved by various constructions such as a restaurant, accommodations, a pier which make the island more suitable in order to live on it. In addition, the natural resources were not affected so much, specially trees.
Before the island was constructed, the island comprised of an unoccupied land with a number of Palma trees, and there was a beach in west part of island. It can be seen from the second map, two different accommodation places including 6-9 houses are created, which is separated by a reception that locates in the central part of island. In order to reach the restaurant, the footpath should be followed which covers island starting from beach to the eastern dwellings.
With regards to transportation of vehicles, the track has been built to connect the reception with pier. Tourists can involve in a range of activities in the sea, for instance, surfing in the sea and swimming in the beach.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...building some tourist facilities on it. Overall, the island has been evolved by ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not affected so much, specially trees. Before the island was constructed, the i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, well, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88415799618 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9372122456 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254742588937 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967662966344 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910515724437 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147441592333 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946950808013 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.